|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 12 posts ] |
|
Let the government know we need Status of Women Canada.
| Author |
Message |
|
kuri
member
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 7:03 pm Posts: 3877 Location: Edmonton
|
 Let the government know we need Status of Women Canada.
*cough* My blog entry today.
But this isn't only self-promotion, but because there's an action involved. REAL Women has engaged in a campaign to eliminate Status of Women Canada because under the SWC's funding eligibility criteria that only fund organizations that do things like promote human rights for women, prevent violence against women and children, and improve women's well-being (as well as, y'know, fit under the Charter). REAL Women's anti-choice, anti-gay, essentially *anti-woman* positions mean they don't meet those criteria.
What's worse is that the Conservative government might actually take these nutbars seriously. I think the Conservatives need to be reminded that they were only elected because they played down the presence of anti-woman nutbars. Getting rid of SWC will only show them to be the radicals that Canadians are afraid of. So if we can all call, write or e-mail our MPs (I have a link in my entry to where you can find your MP if you don't knw it) and cc the following people?
Oda.B@parl.gc.ca - Bev Oda, Status Of Women Minister
grahab0@parl.gc.ca - Bill Graham, Leader of the Opposition
laytoj@parl.gc.ca - Jack Layton, Leader of the NDP
Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca - Gilles Duceppe, Leader of the Bloc Quebecois
Minna.M@parl.gc.ca - Maria Minna, Liberal critic for the Status of Women
Mathyssen.I@parl.gc.ca - Irene Mathyssen, NDP critic for the Status of Women
mourama@parl.gc.ca - Maria Mourani, Bloc critic for the Status Of Women
Thanks!
Last edited by kuri on Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:18 am |
|
 |
|
skdadl
member
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 7:42 am Posts: 28007 Location: heaven
|
If they try to move against SWC, there will be such an uproar ...
But yes: is it important that we make sure Oda is taking that message back to her cabinet colleagues.
Good post, kuri. I think that Berlynn has been on Gwen Landolt's trail as well recently.
I should join in too and give the guys a jolt, shouldn't I. 
|
| Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:34 am |
|
 |
|
kuri
member
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 7:03 pm Posts: 3877 Location: Edmonton
|
Okay, here's my draft letter:
Quote: Dear Mr. Jaffer,
I'm writing you today to express concern over some press attention and Internet talk regarding Status of Women Canada. SWC, you will recall, has a mandate to promote “gender equality, and the full participation of women in the economic, social, cultural and political life of the country. SWC focuses its work in three areas: improving women's economic autonomy and well-being, eliminating systemic violence against women and children, and advancing women's human rights”.
Any fair reading of this demonstrates that it is far from being a 'radical' feminist agenda, yet the organization “REAL Women” and its supporters have been trying to portray it as such. Many women rely on SWC's work ensure that our legal and human rights, as protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms are protected when under attack.
You will undoubtably recall that Conservatives fought hard to gain the trust of Canadians, and in particular to gain our trust that a Conservative government will not be a radical, anti-feminist government that turns back the clock for Canadian women. I certainly hope you will be able to assure me that this trust was not misplaced.
Please keep me informed of any efforts you undertake to ensure the continued funding and operation of this essential agency. This is an important issue to me and many other women to whom I've spoken.
Sincerely, (my real name)
Sound good? Any suggestions?
Last edited by kuri on Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Wed Aug 23, 2006 1:01 pm |
|
 |
|
Toedancer
member
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 7:25 pm Posts: 8522 Location: Ontario
|
Sounds great Kuri. I can use this right?
_________________ Live simply, so others can simply live. Rib Recipe
|
| Wed Aug 23, 2006 2:58 pm |
|
 |
|
kuri
member
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 7:03 pm Posts: 3877 Location: Edmonton
|
Oh, absolutely! 
|
| Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:02 pm |
|
 |
|
skdadl
member
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 7:42 am Posts: 28007 Location: heaven
|
kuri: mere proofreading: para 2, insert "to" before "ensure," and a comma after "Freedoms."
Otherwise: go get 'im.
I have to figure out what to do about Bennett. I'm sure she's onside on this issue -- it's just that I am simultaneously furious with her about Lebanon.

|
| Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:02 pm |
|
 |
|
kuri
member
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 7:03 pm Posts: 3877 Location: Edmonton
|
Thanks, skdadl!  That's my weakness!
That's a tough call. Although I suppose it would possible to just write Oda, and the various critics and leaders, if you feel that you need to limit yourself to one letter to Bennett. (And I can see why you would).
|
| Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:06 pm |
|
 |
|
Toedancer
member
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 7:25 pm Posts: 8522 Location: Ontario
|
Quote: "Like typical radical feminists, they have decided that they speak for all women, and they only consult those groups and women that agree with their agenda," says an entry on the Big Blue Wave blog from Suzanne, who does not give her last name.
"So it's a bunch of radical feminist bureaucrats consulting radical feminists to hear what they want to hear to promote more radical feminism on my dime." Quote: Halifax communications consultant and blogger Audra Williams has mounted her own counter-offensive, urging readers to write to their MP in support of Status of Women Canada.
"This actually turns my blood to ice," Williams wrote last week. "I am calling my MP right now. I mean, I know she's on board, but still I am calling her."
Monica Lysack of the Child Care Advocacy Association of Canada, a recipient of funding from Status of Women Canada, calls the campaign to eliminate the agency "distasteful." http://tinyurl.com/qlpmd (ctv) YAY AUDRA!  eta - And from the Globe http://tinyurl.com/pw5cyAudra's entry from her site Quote: Holy crap my LJ was just quoted in the Globe and Mail.
Oh reporter who is reading this! I could have given you a better soundbyte!
Still. Radical.
(see what I did there?) :clap:
_________________ Live simply, so others can simply live. Rib Recipe
|
| Sat Aug 26, 2006 11:11 am |
|
 |
|
Boom Boom
Mr. Nice Guy
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 9:46 pm Posts: 6089 Location: Make The Rich Pay!
|
If the neocons get re-elected, and to a majority, watch the bastards take an axe to just about everything progressive and protective of Canadian rights. Arrrgh. 
|
| Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:42 pm |
|
 |
|
sparqui
member
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 7:19 pm Posts: 6037 Location: Winnipeg
|
^^^^^ Totally agree Boom Boom 
_________________ If my grandmother had wheels, she'd be a tractor. -- Gilles Duceppe
|
| Sat Aug 26, 2006 3:49 pm |
|
 |
|
webactivist
member
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:21 am Posts: 67 Location: 200 miles from anywhere in mid-northern Ontario
|
Here's a link to DAWN Ontario's (un)R.E.A.L. Women of Canada WATCH page:
http://dawn.thot.net/rwoc_watch.html
|
| Sat Aug 26, 2006 3:52 pm |
|
 |
|
k'in
member
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 8:27 pm Posts: 2086 Location: sunstruck...
|
Quote: REAL Women of Canada's objectives include promoting equality. The organization, which has not received federal funding for several years, is also against abortion and same-sex marriage. It advocates a “Judeo-Christian” understanding of marriage and family life
Quote from the Globe article (bold by me). They should be called on their faulty logic. They say they promote equality than list all the ways they don't. They are both nasty and stupid.
edited to delete extra brackets.
|
| Sat Aug 26, 2006 4:47 pm |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 12 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|